in

This Blog

Syndication

Lloyd Ketchum - YAB, "Yet Another Blog"

August 2007 - Posts

  • Ending the Blame Game - Driving Your Own Car!

    Ed Bott, in a discussion thread in response to one of his blog postings about "No more Vista whining, please" revealed something very troubling - Ed twice stated that he was offered and could make "Big Bucks" if he wrote articles trashing Windows Vista. Well no kidding, was my immediate response - and then I was horrified at my own reaction - I was horrified, because I wasn't surprised by what Ed revealed. I just accepted the idea that people really were willing to ignore facts, obfuscate the truth about the new operating system and all users and small business owners were to be damned - as people were paid to lie about and then trash [for money] an operating system central to the evolution of the ecosystem supporting ninety-plus percent of the computers used around the world. My own reaction made me sick - I used to stand up against such things based upon the worth of truth alone.

    Are advertisers and special interests really willing and or actually paying journalists and bloggers to trash Windows Vista? If so, how does one find evidence of it? I guess these are questions worth asking and it is quite a story, if true. I thought about researching the matter and then I thought about it some more and decided that pursuing so much potentially negative energy would be a lot more costly personally than it would be worth. Instead what you are about to read came to mind.

    Dealing with the Unrelenting, Unforgiving Man in the Mirror - he isn't going to go away!

    We may as well make peace with the man in the mirror right now. Those that do will learn what it is to truly live without fear. Those that don't will continue to seek out and find targets to blame for everything that is wrong in their lives - no matter how big, or small. For now, let's just keep it simple and deal with something small... computers and the operating system that likely runs on it.

    Far too often we spend a lot of time and energy blaming others and or something else for what does not work in our lives - including our personal computers. It's a sad trend and it's getting worse and easier to do. Any time we need support for our efforts to blame others, all we need do is turn to the web and we'll find plenty of others willing to do the same and share our justifications. When it comes to personal computers and Windows we all have plenty of company and lots of angry voices to help us blame Windows for all things troubling, or even mildly challenging about our computers. Very few of those thumping in to support our blame game ever turn us around and march us straight into the nearest mirror and rightfully say, "Dude, the real problem here is between the chair and the keyboard - kindly deal with this idiot, first!"

    The problem isn't the person - the computer user in general. The problem is how we are responding to challenges. Instead of taking ownership and responsibility, we're very quick to look for and blame someone, or some thing else - these days it may as well be Windows Vista. After all, people are apparently being paid to trash it and assign it fault for all things troubling about computers.

    It's not my fault...

    I have an adult child that uses that phrase like a crack addict hits the pipe and it makes me want to vomit and split my own stomach [where did I go so wrong with that one?!?!?] "No, it may very well NOT BE your FAULT, but it for damn sure is likely to be your responsibility."

    Responsibility and Ownership

    Being successful is not the result of the application of some secret formula, or instances of blind luck. Success is a product - responsibility multiplied by the number of times one is willing to take ownership of challenges on behalf of themselves and others. It is high time people re-took responsibility and ownership of their role when operating a modern connected computer. It is long past any time when computer users could wear ignorance like some merit badge. It is time those blessed enough to be born into modern and technically developed societies come to regard computer literacy in the same light as they should general literacy - as an imperative life skill.

    People and Cars - Cars and Computers

    Take your car, and your average driver as an example... Nearly all of us drive everyday. We drive safely, for the most part and responsibly most of the time. We drive without thinking about the mechanics of it and that is how it must be - if we had to think about it, we'd be whacking into one another and a lot of other objects with a great deal more regularity. When a human drives a car they are fully engaged - processing a myriad of actions and information simultaneously. Each of a driver's limbs is in motion and independent of the motion of the other limbs. We're modulating the accelerator, brakes and signals independent of steering and the amazing stereo-optic binocular vision our creator provided each of us is constantly triangulating not only our own time, speed and distance, but that of many dozens of other objects - each in independent motion. Our other sense are not idle either. Our ears are tuned in to all around us and our sense of touch senses how hard we are on and need to brake just as capably as it senses how a car is turning, or how well balanced its wheels are. Our sense of smell alerts us of any potential dangers to man and or machine - the smell of oil, gasoline, exhaust, and even coolant - each can alert us in an instant if there is cause for concern or action. We may even engage our sense of taste as we add the consumption of beverages and snacks as we motor along [not a great idea, and not at all recommended, but we all do it]. These days we also talk on our phones [hoping they are hands free, but realistic enough to know many are not], and God forbid, some even text and send emails! If we stopped and thought about it for even a moment, we might even slow down a little - as we marvel at just how complex and involved driving is.

    As amazing as driving is, and as casually as we all perform the function of driving, we seldom think about how we arrived at such a capable state. Let me refresh our memories... We learned to drive over many years and it began first by watching a great many others drive. We absorbed and learned to mimic the mechanics and art of driving long before we ever touched a wheel of our own. A little later on we sat in the laps of parents, brothers and sisters and other adults in our families - they let us steer as we slowly tooled around an empty lot, farm or early morning road empty of other cars. A bit later we drove little carts at amusement parks and our arms, legs, hands and eyes picked up on the mechanics of driving. We thrilled at all of it - we could sense the freedom under our fingers and we longed to hit the open road on our own. Next we entered formalized drivers training and we learned the rules of the road as well as how to drive technically and safely. We were awarded permits and under the careful eye of an adult, we practiced driving. Finally, we took off on our own - masters of the wheel... or so we thought. As young drivers we all bumped, scrapped and crashed into a lot more things and other cars than most are willing to admit and only after many years of driving and having to pay the price for our mistakes, did we start to really get it and operate our cars like responsible and seasoned members of a very large and growing club.

    All the while we paid for insurance, tickets and maintenance and it all hurt and still does. Over time we embraced the reality that owning and driving a car was a big and costly responsibility and we learned the value of doing it right each and every time. When we had kids we came to understand the real importance of driving safely and defensively and our understanding of this only grew as our children grew and began to drive themselves. We became keenly sensitive to the use of our cars - especially when our kids did not care for them, or heaven forbid, wrecked them. We all paid and very sadly, too many paid, too much and they lost loved ones in terrible accidents. In the end, as much as we came to appreciate our need to drive, we embraced how amazing a privilege it really is.

    In a car, we are trained, licensed, insured, policed, inspected and governed. We are free to drive to any place we wish, when we wish, but there are basic rules and laws we must adhere to if we are to remain safe and retain our privilege to drive. When we wreck a car, even the worst of them seem only to affect a very few and as horrible and tragic as the losses may be, they are most often distant enough from us, that we are tricked into assessing it can't ever involve us. When we operate a personal computer however, we are subject to nearly no laws - though our potential to harm millions is very real.

    Cars and Driving - Perhaps the First "Liberating Technology"

    The car changed us - it changed society as we know it. The car liberated us. We could work, learn, marry, live and die hundreds and thousands of miles distant from where we were born. I named my company, "Liberating Technologies" because I saw computer based technologies as being even more liberating - freeing people from the finite paths over which cars might travel between any two, or more points. As a technology, computers are the most liberating technology we now have - they are the cars we drive along an unending and ever changing network of invisible roads and with them we travel as fast as our minds will let us - rendering the speed of light to some lesser velocity.

    Driving Computers - the most Liberating of Technologies

    First, we have to get our heads around the idea that we drive our computers and by so doing, we are participants on a network of many highways which require that we exercise at least as much care for how we operate a computer as we do a car. Second, we have to stop blaming people and companies for what we experience while operating a computer of any kind and start taking ownership of the experience and responsibility for our actions and the less visible actions taken by our computers. We wouldn't dream of letting an un-trained child or young adult drive our cars and we shouldn't dream of letting a child drive a computer without the same controls, supervision and care we apply to the use of a car. It took us years to reduce the driving of a car to muscle memory and we have to accept that it will take time to master the use of connected computers. We have to commit to educating ourselves and those we are responsible for.

    Once we have accepted the life-long responsibility of properly and safely operating a connected computer, then and only then may we effectively participate among others who have accepted the same. The socialization of the web is great, but we have to admit that it may also be lending a disproportionate share of voice to a highly vocal group of people that may not have earned their full right to that voice. Simply, many operators out there may have the technical skills to drive, but we must ask, do they have the wisdom to drive alongside others and do they have the experience necessary to formulate policies, or even influence those policies that have the potential to impact so many others. We have to condition ourselves and others to stop blaming others and start taking responsibility for how well, or not well, computers operate.

    Like Cars, Computers are More Capable and Complex than Ever Before

    Very few people are shade-tree mechanics any longer. For better and for worse, cars have become so sophisticated and so complex that even the most seasoned professional mechanics are now highly specialized and focused on areas of responsibility. Precious few people are experienced in all areas of how a car is built or works. In our own company, which is a full-service enterprise, we have specialists and no one person has all the capabilities our customers need. Collectively however, our teams do have the required aggregate experience and skill. The very same is true of a modern computer in the context of a user. So it is most important that computer users come to understand to whom they may turn when they need assistance - and they WILL NEED assistance. They may not necessarily need repairs right away, but computer users nearly always need help immediately.

    Stop Blaming Windows and Vista

    Blaming Windows, Vista and Microsoft my score a forum poster style points over at /. or earn a compliant blogger a few more dollars, but it isn't going to solve the challenges people face when learning and using a new operating system.

    We have proved to ourselves, our customers and readers that Windows Vista can be made to run not just well, but perfectly. I have shared our work and experiences here. We know and have shown that with the application of normal levels of effort and care, that Windows Vista is capable of satisfying claims of being the most capable, secure and easiest to use version of Windows yet made. We know from our own use that Windows Vista is more than just capable and reliable, it is a joy to use - it's fast, beautiful to look at and things really are easy to find - be they applications, documents, or media of any type.

    We also know how sophisticated Windows Vista is and that it took very hard work to design and manufacture computers and software that allow it to do what it does best. We know how hard we studied to learn and understand it from every perspective and how to optimize it for different roles.

    We assess that computer users need to apply similar, but relevant efforts in learning the new operating system and the hardware they purchased, or purposed in support of Windows Vista.

    The Parallels between Cars and Computers are nearly Endless but there are differences, too!

    The most common parallel between computers and cars are the people that drive them - we humble human beings. We are fragile, complex little bi-peds with sharp teeth and sharper tongues. We have devolved in a lot of ways - we seem to delight in getting over on the other guy, or we fume in traffic and on the message boards. When it all heads south, we look for whom we might blame and blaming Microsoft and Windows Vista is as big, fat and attractive a target as they come - juicier and more available than Ford and Firestone - despite the fact that we never, ever check the air in our tires!

    No one is immune from the blame game. Not me, not you and not well heeled techies the likes of Jim Louderback [no wonder PC MAG is on the ropes - the former senior editor wouldn't have made a decent PC Tech, much less a great computer engineer - not if you read his empty rant and take from it what I did...].

    We've all done it. We've set down our responsibilities, picked up a big fluffy pillow and cried out load about how unfair it all is. We need to stop it.

    Action is what is Required

    This post is not enough by a long shot. We have to do more. I have to assume that people will read this and really want to learn more and take back ownership of what they do on and with a PC.

    While we have always made ourselves available for COST FREE computer user training, we're taking it a step further and opening a school. We're offering our customers, their families, friends and colleagues, FREE access to training on Windows Vista, Office 2007, Exchange 2007, WSS 3.0, Windows Server 2003/2008 and all that may be done with and on them. Every other Saturday of every month, we will host people in our data center and simply share what and how we drive our PC's, networks and software. We have a full lab available and it includes all the systems, media systems, HDTV's and associated bits we all use every day. We're open and we're going to share and help people take back and own their computers and perhaps learn to face that guy in the mirror on our own terms in the process.

    We hope you'll join us for the ride.

  • Outgoing PC Magazine editor Jim Louderback, Trashes Vista on His Way Out

    Outgoing PC Magazine editor Jim Louderback, trashed Windows Vista as he exited the magazine for his new role as the CEO of Revision3.

    Thank God for Ed Bott's Microsoft Report, where he P0wned Jim and his lame assed parting shot at Vista.

    There's more and sadly, less to it than that...

    While Ed exposes many flaws in Jim's article, "Passing the Torch" he doesn't ask or offer reasons why the outgoing editor of PC Magazine wrote such an article, clearly contradicting himself and his earlier and consistent praise for the new Windows OS. To me it is pretty easy to understand why up to his departure for Revision3, Jim seemed to like the new OS. Jim is headed for Revision3 and a sea of young personalities that have made great sport of bashing the new OS - directly and indirectly. So for Jim Louderback, joining the Vista-Bashers is all about re-establishing street cred with his new flock. It's that simple - Jim can't be seen as pro-Vista, or even objective. Oh no, in his new role, Jim has to be against pretty much everything established - regardless of merit, or facts. Jim will have to be edgy and cool and ditch his friendly, approachable and irrepressible harmless self - you know, the one that endeared him to millions despite his often frenetic and scattered approach to many things technical. When Jim was Jim, he was fun, spontaneous and full of surprises and it was a blast to watch him step through his almost boyish presentation of anything new. Only when Jim was forced into a more sedate character and serious presenter did he seem to lose his way and timing that was as much comedic as it was technically accurate. Stuffed into the "Fresh Gear" confines, which seemed to choke him, Jim sucked, but on his own and on the floor of the Las Vegas convention center as a co-host of DL.TV's CES 2007 coverage, he was indeed fresh, and a lot of fun - no one could keep up and even the younger co-hosts seemed stiff and off-balance as wave after charming wave of Jim, the technical court jester, came crashing in. He was smart - very smart, but a lot of fun, too.

    So what's the problem?

    False motivations and weak attempts to establish some cred with the kids aside, Jim is headed for Revision3 as a leader and it's leadership that is what will be expected of him. Leadership demands that well..., one leads and they had better start doing that leading from the very first second their boot hits the ground first and ahead of anyone they are in front of. One does not establish a role as a leader of great people by parroting what they assess those people want to hear. If Revision3 is to fulfill its role as one of the main activities ushering in the new media, following isn't the way to get started. Whatever one's values are one has to remain true to them and if objectivity and a sense of reality are among those Jim is best known for, he'd have been better served sticking to them. Similarly, Jim is right and proper to respect his new charges, but absolutely foolish and utterly stupid to fear them - which is what I assess his most recent remarks bashing Windows Vista to be all about. Coming from "PC" Magazine of all places, he can't just nip the hand that fed him for so many years - oh no, in order to have cred these days Jim had to turn about and bite the damn thing off entirely - or so he seems to think, as I see it and as I interpret his parting piece.

    Leaders Lead, Jim!

    Your new colleagues needed a dose - a serious dose - of reality and humility. The better angle might have been to speak to how Windows Vista, like any very complex and powerful operating system, performs at its best coming from the hands of equally complex and powerful people - you know, the sometimes boring, but always professional engineers that deliver and support systems based upon the new Windows. I could go on, but I know I don't have to. If Jim does read this - which I doubt, I know he'll get the point on the first pass. The question is and perhaps Jim's greatest new challenge, will his younger colleagues at Revision3 get it and can he lead and teach them if they don't?

  • IE 7 Reset Quick Tip

    Anyone who supports people using computers pretty quickly realizes why the PC is so popular - it accommodates so many different types of uses, people and profiles, or the combination of human user and PC configurations - the variations are nearly endless. Supporting so many choices can be fun, but it can be challenging, too. Just as quickly support engineers come to understand that if a PC can be borked by a user it will be (that has to be on some kind of list some where...), and in ways that can be very creative.

    There are days and then there are days...

    Some days are easy - some are very hard and we've seen our share of both. We've seen unmanaged users contort a PC into such a mess that it almost appears that there is no way it couldn't have been done intentionally. Some home and SOHO PC's we come across are so jacked that as we scratch our heads we imagine teams of NASA engineers working overtime to create some kind of uber-final doomsday scenario as part of an advanced simulation designed to test system engineers. "How in the.... <trying not to shake one's head>" is a common reaction.

    As fun as it is to imagine how some systems end up in the messy state we find them, it is even more fun to fix them and restore them and their users to full productivity. In most cases we run across, the cause behind a poorly running PC are many third-party applications plug-ins. Windows is very reliable and predictable and has been for a long time and so are many non-Microsoft applications people buy. I say, most... 

    When good applications go bad...

    Increasingly, we run across what we like to call, irreverent software - software that assumes things on behalf of users - who may not know what the software assumes is okay for it to suddenly take control of, or add to a user's computer. Irreverent software used to be largely restricted to down loadable free and or shareware titles - the ubiquitous Google tool bar is a prime example - it seems to be bundled with everything under the sun and enabled by default. These days irreverent software is everywhere - buy about any product and one is likely to see its default installation add a wad of undesired bits that were not clearly identified to the user blowing the application into their system. Google's not alone and it may not be the worst offender, but it is the most pervasive. Others include Yahoo, Real, iTunes stuffed into Quick-time installers and of course Microsoft - who often has to include and bundle irreverence in order to comply with one court or another.

    Seasoned systems engineers have seen enough baked systems to know where to look and what to reverse in order to resolve PC issues.  They know that the Other TAB in Outlook 2003 options is where to go to find and clear Apple's iTune's plug-in [if you have the ITMS plugged into Outlook, you need help... just say'in]. They know which .DLL to register in order to fix an MS Office install on a system that can't upload multiple files to a Share-point document library. They've learned to reboot into Safe Mode with Networking before attempting to update DRM security components on a Vista PC [ http://drmlicense.one.microsoft.com/Indivsite/en/indivit.asp?force=1 ] as a solution to a cantankerous Zune, reflecting the nearly infamous 10114 error code. Sometimes however, even the saltiest of systems and support engineers get their backsides handed to them by a PC borked over by irreverent software.

    Sometimes the simplest solution is the best solution...

    When we come across a system that is running poorly and we can't quickly find the underlying reason, we reset Internet Explorer back to its defaults. We've noted that by doing this we can solve a large percentage of PC performance issues that touch on a very wide range of applications and systems components - everything from mail programs to media players can be affected. Fortunately, Internet Explorer 7 features as easy "RESET" button under the advanced TAB in IE's Properties. By pressing reset, all temp files and plug-ins are disabled - but... not in IE alone - they are also removed from programs like Outlook 2002/2003, etc...

    Internet Explorer 7 Reset button

    While one will have to add back the behaviors and plug-ins they do want, clicking IE 7's Reset is a good way to restore a great many things that may be too hard to find for less seasoned users and support engineers.